Preparatory thoughts: an Advent meditation on suffering

"For all creation groans in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed: For this, the creation was subjected to frustration... in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God. (Romans 8:19-21)
There is no power on earth that has the power to corrupt so thoroughly and utterly completely than that of the love of money. All of historical deadly sins have their root in this one attitude which wields a power so complete, that it exerts its tyranny both on those who have wealth as well as those who don't. Few if any are free from its spell, a net cast so broad as to encompass the whole world. Steve Taylor sang of its poison in his Rock opera "Cash Cow" in which we see this deceit especially recorded in the historical context of a chosen people.

This is the evil which found its expression in the likes of the pagan emperor Nero, Adolf Hitler, and far worse. Upon the Christianizing of the empire under Constantine, it adopted "Christian" disguises first under Arianism, and then under the Roman Church; through which to carry out its suppression of those who sought any deeper truth. According to John Foxe two thirds of the property possessed through the inquisitions became that of the Roman Church, while the remainder placated local princes and served as fodder for literally centuries of violence. The Crusades themselves exist in our popular history somewhat corrupted by the belief that the battle cry was 'kill the infidel moors'. Far more Christian Anti-papists fell victim to the villainy of the Crusades than any other. Crimes for which the Roman church (post Vatican II) has only recently begun to atone. During the whole of the "Moorish crusades", nearly 2 million people died, most of whom were Christian (although non-roman, or anti-papists), the bulk of the remaining victims were Jews slaughtered by both warring sides. There were however, other Crusades specifically against Christians such as the Albigensian Crusade, in which the Roman church authorized the massacre of over a million people, promising eternal life to any who would carry it out. And during the undeclared crusade known as the thirty years war more than 4 million people perished.

The Cathars, Albigensians and Waldensians, although all having different elements (and accused of dualism and gnosticism) all preached a gospel of the kingdom requiring the forsaking of mammon, for which they were reproved and eventually persecuted to the point of extinction. Originally known as the "poor catholics" Waldensians differed very little from Orthodox faith, except in their renunciation of money. Even the Anabaptists were persecuted primarily because of their belief in "equality and the community of goods".

Today the lie of money and materialism has so infiltrated our culture that there is now once again no distinction between good and evil. But, lest we forget that we must jealously regard and defend our liberty - Men were eviscerated for pointing out the absurdity of transubstantiation, burned at the stake for the right to read the Bible, racked and tortured for declaring their faith in Christ alone (and not in the Roman Church) - all at the hands of the very institution that claims to be the Vicar of Christ on earth; the very Christ these people loved and for whom they died.

There is perhaps no greater evil in this world than the spirit of Mammon, by which fathers have killed their own sons, by which injustice of every type is carried out, and to which authorities blind even their own eyes. The militant atheist with his objection to religion is naught but an Anti-theist if when confronted with his own objections to religion, he fails to see a world full of hypocrites clouded by the deceit of money and power. This Anti-theist, is but Mammon's agent and a dark force in the world - desiring not the light of man but its destruction.

Of the hypocrite of which we speak, we see naught but mans true condition, testifying without ceasing and throughout all ages of mans helplessness to be that which he desires - indeed we see his lack of ability to even understand himself, or his desires, if he is so unwittingly and universally a hypocrite to the faiths which he has made claims to hold. This draws for us a picture illustrating the ultimate need for either redemption or disastrous end, to place punctuation upon this a most cruel existence. It is acknowledgement of the cruel existence that is the truest definition of the state of mans sin.

Cash is the currency of power, and as Friedrich Nietzsche pointed out, the human race thrives and falls upon this; the "will to power". Perhaps there is no force more insidious and universal in the life of the mind than this the will to power: I myself would be ready to accept this save for the writing of 'prophets' like Albert Schweitzer who expounds upon a more primal instinct, buried often by the corruptness of greed within what is a nearly crippled human soul.

Perhaps it is as Schweitzer says; respect for life, all life, because we have no power over it (because we cannot cause it) which unites the souls of mankind. Even the dispossessed who "wish to die" do not wish to really dispose of their life, but rather would prefer to "live differently" or not at all. Respect for life, all life, stirs in us an ethics which can be universal, a categorical imperative: to do unto others as thou wouldst have others do unto you.

This teaching is far from new. The second of the very wise four noble truths of Buddha teach us that “Desire causes suffering”. “The love of money is the cause of every kind of wickedness” (1 Timothy 6:10). Even the ancient Hebrews were forbade to make a profit off their neighbor in the charging of usury (Deuteronomy 23:20-21). It was about this which many inquired of Jesus “who is my neighbor?”
Unless we become free from the tyranny of money, we cannot see the true power structures around us. Until we see the true power structures around us we are blind sheep being led to slaughter. The Good news of the gospel is that no matter what illusions we may see, or artificial structures we may create; money has no real power (Many solutions & were largely concerned with the movements of small, green pieces of paper,& Douglas Adams), Death has no real power, (O death, where [is] thy sting? O grave, where [is] thy victory? 1 Corinthians 15:55 KJV).

This is the good news of the kingdom of God, the authority of heaven, and the message of Jesus Christ.
"For all creation groans in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed: For this, the creation was subjected to frustration... in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God. (Romans 8:19-21)

In everything give thanks for this is the will of God

Hopefully I will not bore you with a little bit of a word study. When the Pilgrims landed in 1621, and upon the institution of the day which we commemorate with gladiatorial munera and feats of extraordinary gluttony; the Pilgrims ate a meal, literally a Eucharist. Now we of protestant persuasions, may forget the meaning behind such wording, because of their catholic associations, but we must never forget their even truer associations with the Christ we profess, and to whom we “give thanks.”

Eucharist: meaning to give thanks, comes from the Greek word Charis, which means grace, but it also means beauty, and gratefulness. If we remove the writings of Paul from our survey we find even in secular writings, the concept of a God or gods who bestow upon men good things undeserved, for which the only responses can be contempt or gratefulness. Charis begets Charis. According to James Dunn, the secular usage of the word Charis always implied reciprocity. The one who receives the act of grace responds with grace.

We look at Paul's teaching separately because Paul uses Charis to draw a complex theology based on two key principles of the gospel: love and grace. Paul uses his understanding of the Hebrew Scriptures to draw together the principles of two Hebrew words meaning "favor" and "loving kindness" and combines the most positive features of the two when he uses the word Charis:
· On the one hand there is the unilateral sense of the undeserved favor of God,
· and on the other hand there is the lasting commitment of his loving kindness.
Just like elsewhere, Paul plays upon the concept that grace begets gratefulness, but always in the sense of "thanks" and never in the sense of a favor returned to God. When we look at the world around us we cannot help but become acutely aware of the turmoil and struggle everywhere. Depression, Poverty, Sickness, Hatred, Doom and gloom.
"For all creation groans in eager expectation for the sons of God to be revealed: It was for this that the creation was subjected to frustration... in hope that the creation itself will be liberated from its bondage to decay and brought into the freedom and glory of the children of God.” (Romans 8:19-21)
It is in the midst of this that God's light penetrates the darkness. And we are called to be lights of grace to others as a grateful response; it is in this that we are transformed. This is precisely why the cross is such a powerful symbol of grace, because it was in the darkness and fulfillment of the evil and dysfunction of human kind that God shone his light most clearly, that “while we were yet sinners Christ died for us.” (Romans 5:8)

The cross itself is an ancient symbol, and not unique to Christianity. It was used by the Norse, the ancient Egyptians, and Aryan civilization in India and was familiar to the entire Hellenized world. When the disciples of Jesus came onto the stage of world history, they did not use a cross of any sort but rather symbolized their faith with cryptic symbols such as a sheep or a fish drawn from the Greek Characters Iota, Chi, Theta, Upsilon, and Sigma

In the fourth and Fifth centuries AD the symbols of the religious establishment began to become entrenched. Just as the canon, doctrine, and church hierarchy had begun to become more "official" so did the religious symbols associated with Christianity. No longer facing persecutions by the state, in fact on mandate by the state under emperor Constantine, the cross became the dominant symbol of the Christian faith.

The Crucifix is however unique symbol within Christianity. Unlike the Chi-Rho, or the Ichthus there are no pagan equivalents, or astrological explanations, to the depiction of a suffering Jesus dying on the cross of crucifixion. Although extraneous examples of the use of a cross as a Christian symbol exist before Constantine, it wasn't until the sixth century that people had the audacity to depict the cross with the dying suffering form of Jesus upon it. These symbols contrary to our current thinking of catholic vs. protestant rose within the popular conscience over a period starting in the sixth century peeking in the fourteenth century and declining in the eighteenth century; why?

Hardships endured by the population of Europe ushered in the Medieval or dark ages. In 541, and again in 588, the plague of Justinian wiped out perhaps as much as 50% of world population. The Mysterious Pestilence which again broke out in Europe in 1348 killed a further 100 million people in two years. The most commonly noted symptom was the appearance of swelling in the lymph nodes, which oozed and bled. This was followed by acute fever and vomiting of blood. Most victims died within two to seven days.

For the next four hundred years, this plague would return several times accompanying wars and turmoil, inflicting regional devastation on the fearful populace. It was to these terrified people that the image of a suffering Jesus spoke peace; they could not easily identify with and empty cross, with a Jesus who was only in heaven, a place where there was no suffering; but they could identify with the image of that Word made flesh which had suffered like them, and for them.

From 1618–1648 one of the most bloody and brutal conflicts that Europe ever faced, raged on in the area surrounding Eilenburg Germany. During the Thirty years war, at least 4 million Germans died. Because this city was walled and secure, it became a haven for refugees and a prime breeding ground for "Yersinia Pestis" a small anaerobic bacterium natural to rodents such as marmots, and transmitted by fleas; the cause of both Bubonic and Pneumonic plague.

It was in this context that we meet a minister in Eilenberg in 1636. At the beginning of the outbreak between 1636 and 1638 there were four ministers serving in Eilenburg, but by the middle of 1637 one had fled, and one of the remaining three had buried his other colleagues as well as his wife. By the time it was over and done with more than 4,480 people had perished within the walls of this small city.

Our text tonight is short and simple, from Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians: In everything give thanks for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus.

The Medieval saint: John of the Cross wrote “One act of thanksgiving made when things go wrong is worth a thousand when things go well." While facing the brutalities of war and the suffering of Plague Martin Rinkart left us with an enduring lesson in Thanksgiving that I hope will live with us and remind us to be transformed more and more into the likeness of Jesus; and I hope a lesson that we will take with us and be reminded of while we partake of a meal that should truly be called Eucharist: Thanksgiving. For while Martin Rinkart, Arch Deacon of Eilenburg, performed at times 50 funerals a day, burying the dead in mass graves, and faithfully ministering to the living, he had plenty of reason to despair, But as we end, I ask you to meditate on his words penned from the hope he found in the Jesus who suffered upon that cross:

Now thank we all our God
With hearts and hands and voices;
Who wondrous things hath done,
In whom this world rejoices.
Who, from our mother's arms,
Hath led us on our way,
With countless gifts of love,
And still is ours today.

Why I'm waiting for Ron Jeremy to become a Christian.

Do a quick search for Christian literary agents, and see what they're interested in publishing (same goes for publishers) It reflects pretty much what takes up most of the shelves at the Christian Book store; Junk. I was in the Christian book store the other day browsing the new releases and was struck by the fact that some of the authors of supposed theological books were people who were famous for other reasons, or deserve to be published simply because they manage to fool 10,000 people a week at their mega-church (success is the proof of truth right?). We live in a culture where the man who landed a plane in the Hudson river is a respected aviation expert, (nothing against sully) not because he's an expert, but because he has brand recognition. In Christianity like the rest of the world it seems that brand recognition and loyalty is the major onus behind much that is produced (and a major reason I've started collecting and reading old books). Our current "discussions" are so vacuous and uninformed they're downright incestuous.

I can tell you; if you're a washed up celebrity, becoming "born again" and writing books seems to be a good career move.

135 clickthroughs 45 site visits and 37 comments this week

All from one visitor: Some of you are aware of the ongoing struggles my family and I have endured being harassed by my father in law. I briefly pulled this blog in the winter of 2010, and some of the followers have received inappropriate contact involving personal details that simply should be labeled TMI. Documenting this has been arduous, we have two reams of documents, and have filed all appropriate material with law enforcement agencies, but nobody can apparently agree upon jurisdiction, while my wife shakes in terror anytime his name is mentioned, not withstanding his threats to file false reports about abuse simply so we can "feel what it's like". It is clear that either he has read nothing I have written, or I have done such a terrible job of expression using the English language as to be incomprehensible (not altogether un-likely) Some part of "please cease all contact with me and my family" doesn't convey to him clearly. It is clearly ethical for someone who has a long history to obey the wishes of his adult daughter, and cease harassing her and her family. It would also seem the lesser of evils for the husband to censor comments left by this individual because regardless of the content, the contact is inappropriate:
"Am I now bowing to the master of all wisdom or just another jumped up purveyor of the "God tyranny" AKA Joshua Jinno?" "The scriptures are very clear on the matter, if that is, you've actually bothered to read them." "But then you're not really a Christian are you? - you're just pretending to be what you are not. You and your ante-church - follower of the ante-Christ - doing the devil's work." "Who would presume to determine directions over a landscape of your imaginations. But then again, you might simply be, all at sea?"

"You are not an artist, not even a craftsman of any worth. At the moment, a Pagan and/or a Tax Collector - maybe." "Consider by comparison, that heretical position you've established." "Get the message now - - and If you don't want fair comment on your public Blog - I suggest you don't have one."

"Only despots delete fair comment!" "If you delete this comment, one is left with little alternative but to publish fair comment by an alternative route." "You clearly don't understand "Ethics". True ethics appears to be beyond your mind set Josh. This was never a matter of who could shout the loudest or indeed, who could be the best bully to appear more righteous than another. It's simply a matter of equity. If you again delete fair comment to your public blog, you've simply proved to yourself, unworthy of everything for which you claim to stand fore there can be no Grace in you."

"Religious Fundamentalists like yourself however, appear to want everything your own way in demand for "certainty"; indeed where only your God is held in such high regard as "highest authority" by which cause you attempt to determine your own. From my understanding, your God is exactly the same God as given reference within the "Abrahamic faiths", the very same God of the suicide bomber, having described as "arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal genocidal filicidal pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.". The subject of morality and ethics would appear to go beyond the needless confusions of theology. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics (fourth upload - this could be infinite)"
Just the highlights.

Ethics

I was listening to a report on NPR this week in which the reporter asked an official if he was concerned about the ethical boundaries he was crossing (specifically about whether an innocent person could be prosecuted and convicted under a new statute). What was absolutely terrorizing to me, was not that he was willing to wrestle with that question or to define that line, but rather that he deferred to a court decision saying: "well the courts have ruled that it is OK."

Wait a second. There were courts in Nazi Germany, there are kangaroo courts in military style governments all around the world (including some US military tribunals) and yet someone, anyone, has the audacity to defer to a court over a question of ethics. It is the ultimate insult against human reason and intellect to assert that any court whether High or Supreme, is the highest authority on issues of ethics. It is the mindset of those living in countries where they are servants of mighty despots, to defer to their betters on issues of ethics, but in a supposedly free nation where the government is meant to serve the people, we do not have the liberty to delegate our ethics; especially to those who wish to be the new kings in the monarchical system (that still exists) from which we came.

Lack of a higher authority, for the voice of the Almighty in our conscience guiding mens convictions will be our undoing. I am more and more convinced that the only Hell that we need fear is to live and die in a world of our own making.

Tithing

I recently made a post in a facebook discussion about my belief that Tithing is the churches biggest hermeneutical hypocrisy. Many of the posts and responses simply affirmed "Tithing is a biblical teaching" "Tithing is a requirement of Scripture" etc... The only major passage in the bible that directly deals with tithing is in Malachi, and while this teaching is used as a justification for the command to tithe (which Jesus never taught by the way) these same people go to great lengths to explain that when Malachi says "God hates Divorce" he wasn't really serious.

See when I look at what Jesus taught he says that the good shepherd gives his life for his lambs. He says do not worry about what you will eat or what you will drink or what you will wear... but seek first the Kingdom of God and His Righteousness, and all these things will be added to you as well. There are reasons to give to the support of the church, in fact you can be an agent of God's provision. But the reality that needs to be highlighted is that when people don't tithe, it's not an indicator of "lack of faith" - but whenever a preacher tells you to Tithe; that is.